Information on Result #472072

There is no (83, 191, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3732 215563 414344 230157 328919 617954 608155 295406 882155 865696 > 2191

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (83, 192, 174)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction