Information on Result #472113

There is no (165, 191, 150030)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3138 701487 325114 739596 549030 480652 433505 183487 726635 236339 > 2191

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 192, 150030)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction