Information on Result #472155

There is no (126, 192, 696)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6531 615170 648894 916554 041363 855014 370308 052368 132744 443427 > 2192

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 193, 696)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction