Information on Result #472160

There is no (136, 192, 1269)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6289 429490 035075 831139 907212 579967 747880 332050 835852 035916 > 2192

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 193, 1269)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction