Information on Result #472173

There is no (162, 192, 45787)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6277 140913 890574 442624 572776 796347 965634 902218 751261 667848 > 2192

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 193, 45787)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction