Information on Result #472174

There is no (164, 192, 81239)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6278 118562 450915 708383 421691 190657 717181 827533 611890 717306 > 2192

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 193, 81239)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction