Information on Result #472200
There is no (95, 193, 228)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13859 159083 643830 732185 887367 638574 104497 453254 184699 574164 > 2193
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 194, 228)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |