Information on Result #472235

There is no (165, 193, 85363)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12555 292490 139105 256662 821444 092031 615026 096243 210853 207532 > 2193

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 194, 85363)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction