Information on Result #472262

There is no (98, 194, 244)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25613 547661 260286 650648 885914 815301 863119 291542 693576 410711 > 2194

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 195, 244)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction