Information on Result #472295

There is no (164, 194, 50223)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25112 652175 392805 449702 308749 928545 884537 068222 716071 081206 > 2194

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 195, 50223)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction