Information on Result #472316

There is no (83, 195, 171)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 60719 790094 538013 010581 698782 713032 209810 179600 853675 226296 > 2195

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (83, 196, 171)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction