Information on Result #472324

There is no (99, 195, 249)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56211 268133 255866 634800 016350 772202 522650 577072 332620 704933 > 2195

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 196, 249)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction