Information on Result #472378

There is no (84, 196, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 123910 503743 379843 217902 692015 850460 331377 054039 910159 332360 > 2196

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (84, 197, 174)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction