Information on Result #472379

There is no (86, 196, 181)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 107565 168232 125645 673645 539811 975433 596870 008979 667393 413304 > 2196

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 197, 181)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction