Information on Result #472399

There is no (126, 196, 625)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 103956 116179 340280 627455 949558 729174 325099 702827 688658 016776 > 2196

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 197, 625)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction