Information on Result #472416

There is no (160, 196, 14296)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 100458 288605 620367 998144 414930 587729 261979 763608 642245 590213 > 2196

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 197, 14296)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction