Information on Result #472419

There is no (166, 196, 55088)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 100451 420812 548994 317105 351997 675949 732128 388912 029161 397883 > 2196

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 197, 55088)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction