Information on Result #472524

There is no (126, 198, 595)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 408734 016861 879151 343324 990485 946946 620759 418915 919338 580680 > 2198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 199, 595)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction