Information on Result #472525

There is no (128, 198, 652)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 411352 236613 508610 213281 208293 250225 878895 780291 843897 503092 > 2198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 199, 652)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction