Information on Result #472533

There is no (144, 198, 1723)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 406539 365178 841255 627164 174503 316384 955315 207386 643428 580610 > 2198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (144, 199, 1723)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction