Information on Result #472545

There is no (168, 198, 60424)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 401803 300729 438492 484982 054768 903782 789064 370012 189161 890176 > 2198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (168, 199, 60424)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction