Information on Result #472564
There is no (81, 199, 161)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 815466 897834 485825 893252 249114 473866 290222 079242 135166 878592 > 2199
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (81, 200, 161)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |