Information on Result #472576

There is no (105, 199, 282)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 858271 997468 017800 104611 739932 262866 829889 308807 199757 380672 > 2199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (105, 200, 282)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction