Information on Result #472591

There is no (135, 199, 907)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 826616 374954 762664 516697 022669 899905 248519 747167 593918 792372 > 2199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 200, 907)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction