Information on Result #472606

There is no (165, 199, 23951)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 803770 843821 675393 432065 600556 660817 128713 483482 068522 567232 > 2199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 200, 23951)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction