Information on Result #472629
There is no (84, 200, 171)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 898237 187718 842812 599712 865787 169969 681322 451126 239107 596984 > 2200
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 201, 171)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |