Information on Result #472630
There is no (86, 200, 178)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 816837 966987 036719 001231 937909 093616 664681 390475 844796 942768 > 2200
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (86, 201, 178)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |