Information on Result #472631

There is no (88, 200, 186)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 957675 000946 670896 217039 602727 347922 988435 356254 987695 658269 > 2200

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (88, 201, 186)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction