Information on Result #472638

There is no (102, 200, 258)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 787285 484003 056442 502258 129065 105091 625853 744865 417915 338864 > 2200

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 201, 258)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction