Information on Result #472670
There is no (166, 200, 24949)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 607777 514006 499142 860940 687830 358088 475614 593116 549401 766874 > 2200
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (166, 201, 24949)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |