Information on Result #472692

There is no (85, 201, 174)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 951181 670003 708199 335081 189999 306480 154796 476294 027926 040464 > 2201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 202, 174)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction