Information on Result #472701

There is no (103, 201, 262)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 295286 453629 242357 756343 045559 228046 328668 373199 526249 194864 > 2201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (103, 202, 262)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction