Information on Result #472717

There is no (135, 201, 850)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 284201 148959 046531 282095 044111 448191 770130 258332 446331 253950 > 2201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 202, 850)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction