Information on Result #472735

There is no (171, 201, 69412)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 214273 805798 581948 804782 323351 182675 632337 439282 022304 736648 > 2201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 202, 69412)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction