Information on Result #472755

There is no (82, 202, 163)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 292356 543708 254562 350559 399294 946572 875814 792543 156742 467744 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 203, 163)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction