Information on Result #472778

There is no (128, 202, 592)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 512028 325817 388180 350781 342652 240179 014601 616588 603108 696390 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 203, 592)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction