Information on Result #472797

There is no (166, 202, 18019)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 431197 919727 720121 520772 843116 450933 725198 226137 723107 652394 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 203, 18019)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction