Information on Result #472801

There is no (174, 202, 133299)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 428402 331829 689109 883998 659936 704714 583537 287399 013184 589212 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (174, 203, 133299)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction