Information on Result #472823

There is no (91, 203, 195)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14 164231 622930 533450 013818 103051 854216 621415 943526 713794 884520 > 2203

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (91, 204, 195)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction