Information on Result #472858

There is no (161, 203, 7024)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 882891 684438 786565 506923 505781 254384 677636 459098 892160 520230 > 2203

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 204, 7024)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction