Information on Result #472863

There is no (171, 203, 44837)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 858943 777809 896294 568657 128773 776041 310072 573373 212273 480894 > 2203

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 204, 44837)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction