Information on Result #472884
There is no (82, 204, 162)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29 448693 729735 001347 337194 642594 354266 806639 357642 282781 619232 > 2204
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (82, 205, 162)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |