Information on Result #472974

There is no (133, 205, 688)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 52 181222 479411 887736 077118 207592 287478 575162 933180 282892 447853 > 2205

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 206, 688)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction