Information on Result #472993

There is no (171, 205, 30596)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 51 434974 755681 880585 025147 377945 411064 809905 077347 520525 318504 > 2205

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 206, 30596)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction