Information on Result #473020

There is no (92, 206, 196)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 106 883936 880518 525032 533687 500929 780512 817842 645193 787804 634632 > 2206

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 207, 196)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction