Information on Result #473061

There is no (174, 206, 51063)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 102 867487 716485 371772 823140 576899 012486 161550 500478 850256 006247 > 2206

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (174, 207, 51063)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction