Information on Result #473147

There is no (82, 208, 160)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 456 851521 048762 961575 986521 623602 560391 875130 431173 405930 592044 > 2208

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 209, 160)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction