Information on Result #473148
There is no (84, 208, 166)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 447 012965 889464 872765 620615 243967 065214 400178 941275 582502 370368 > 2208
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 209, 166)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |