Information on Result #473189

There is no (166, 208, 8290)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 412 367508 274584 347833 897263 907439 533637 936606 942920 103984 234984 > 2208

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 209, 8290)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction