Information on Result #473255
There is no (165, 209, 6524)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 823 971142 691647 827939 403927 791943 779970 310277 354451 663507 446534 > 2209
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (165, 210, 6524)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |